Magnetars and photons.

“A Swinburne astronomer may have just confirmed one of the quirkiest aspects of quantum mechanics: Space that seems empty can alter the behavior of light. Credit: NASA.” (ScitechDaily, Empty Space May Not Be Empty After All: Magnetar Reveals a Bizarre Quantum Effect)

The big problem is that. Magnetars pull particles around them. And that means that. Space around those light neutron stars is not empty. Space is not empty at all. There is dust and particles. Along with quantum fields, those things can affect light. More strongly. Than we can even imagine. 

The magnetar is a very bright object. The energy that magnetars release in seconds matches the energy that the Sun releases in 250000 years. A magnetar forms a pulsar. It is so bright. Its brightness covers the nebula around the magnetar. The effect is similar. 

We see a bright lamp in fog. The brightness of that light covers the fog below it. We see light but not fog around it. 

“Astronomers studying one of the most magnetic objects in the universe have found some of the strongest evidence yet for a bizarre effect predicted by quantum physics nearly 90 years ago. The finding suggests that a powerful magnetic field can change the way light travels through a vacuum, even when no ordinary matter is present.”(ScitechDaily, Empty Space May Not Be Empty After All: Magnetar Reveals a Bizarre Quantum Effect)

“The phenomenon is known as ‘vacuum birefringence.’ It emerges from quantum electrodynamics (QED), the theory describing how light and charged particles interact. Werner Heisenberg and Hans Euler predicted the underlying effect in 1936, proposing that what appears to be Space can behave differently when exposed to an extraordinarily strong magnetic field “.(ScitechDaily, Empty Space May Not Be Empty After All: Magnetar Reveals a Bizarre Quantum Effect)

“In particle physics, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the relativistic quantum field theory of electrodynamics. In essence, it describes how light and matter interact and is the first theory where full agreement between quantum mechanics and special relativity is achieved. QED mathematically describes all phenomena involving electrically charged particles interacting by means of exchange of photons and represents the quantum counterpart of classical electromagnetism, giving a complete account of matter and light interaction”. (Wikipedia, Quantum electrodynamics)

“In technical terms, QED can be described as a perturbation theory of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum. Richard Feynman called it "the jewel of physics" for its extremely accurate predictions of quantities. Like. The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron and the Lamb shift of the energy levels of hydrogen. Ch1  : It is the most precise and stringently tested theory in physics. However, the prediction of vacuum zero energy made by QED has a 10^120 magnitude difference. Compared to the experimentally observed value. This is called the cosmological constant problem or vacuum catastrophe.” (Wikipedia, Quantum electrodynamics)

Magnetars are the most powerful magnets in the universe. These extremely strong magnetic objects show that magnetic fields affect light. The extremely strong magnetic field forms a structure. Their waves make the field denser at some points. Those fields also trap ions in their magnetic lines. And those things can affect the course of photons. The problem with magnetars is their form as neutron stars. 

The main problem is how to separate gravitational and magnetic effects. And then particles that those fields collect.

Into them. They can also cause changes in photons’ trajectories. All gravitational objects pull gas and dust around them. This means it’s hard to separate gravitational and scattering effects. From. Each other. 

The magnetic field and gravitational field trap particles around those objects. The magnetic field can sort electrons and protons along the magnetic force lines. Their field is denser. This means that the magnetar sorts particles with an electric charge. In a form similar to how iron powder aligns around regular magnets. This means it is hard to see. 

If. Changes in photon trajectory. Caused by the magnetic field itself. Or do those changes happen because of changes in the particle volume? If. There are denser particle fronts in the magnetic field. That can also cause the change in the light trajectory. Strong magnetic fields can also form standing waves. That can affect the trajectory of light. When light travels in wave form. There is a possibility. That. Those waves can affect the photon trajectory. An extremely strong magnetic field can also heat gas. And ions become very hot. Ions and anions follow magnetic fields. But neutral gas follows the gravitational waves. 

That forms friction, and friction forms radiation. And that radiation can change photon trajectory. Another thing that can change the photon trajectory. It is another photon. Magnetars and their close environment send X- and gamma rays. That radiation forms in whirling gas. That high-energy radiation can change the photon's trajectory. But can a magnetic field affect light? That can happen because of another field. That means that when a magnetic field pulls another field into it. That other field can affect photons' trajectory. And, of course. Magnetar’s strong gravity. It can itself affect photons. 

https://scitechdaily.com/empty-space-may-not-be-empty-after-all-magnetar-reveals-a-bizarre-quantum-effect/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics

Quasistars, or black hole stars. Could they explain? Heavier-than-hydrogen particles formed? In the young universe?

“Stars (left) can be thought of as a dense ball of gas powered by nuclear fusion at their centers. Black holes (center) typically grow by consuming matter via a pancake-like accretion disk. Black hole stars (right) represent a new kind of object — nascent black holes enshrouded in dense gas. Such. That they effectively radiate in a star-like manner. The accreting black hole, as the power source, plays the role of nuclear fusion, and the dense surrounding gas acts similarly to a pseudo-photosphere.” (MIT News, Astronomers discover a brand-new type of astrophysical object: A black hole star)

A new explanation for “Little red dots” at the dawn of time is that they are so-called black hole stars. The JWST telescope discovered those distant objects. And now astronomers suggest that those dots could be black hole stars. Astronomers found an object called MoM-BH*-1 that is so-called black hole star. Often also known as a quasistar. The quasistar is a little bit like a quasar. In that formation, black holes pull matter inside them symmetrically. 

This means a quasistar looks like a giant red giant. This kind of formation forms when a particle cloud symmetrically surrounds a black hole. That forms a structure. That looks like a star. But its size is enormous. Material flows into that structure, forming flows. They make hydrogen atoms impact each other. This flow forms fusion in that massive and weird structure. 

Could it be possible? That. Those little red dots could be quasistars or black hole stars. Could form first. Heavier-than-hydrogen elements. In the very young universe. In this model, those little red dots formed fusion. That made heavier atoms in the hydrogen universe. This model introduces that the first black holes formed. 

Straight. From radiation. Or from some collapsing bubble. That pulled hydrogen atoms close to each other. This formed a gravitational center. That formed the black holes. 

Anyway. The key question is always. Which formed first? Particles or black holes? If particles formed first. Did those first black holes form from quark-gluon plasma? Any particle with mass can form a black hole. And there is a small possibility. That the guoballs. 

Gluonic matter can explain the first black holes. In a very young universe, the energy level was very high. That energy can turn gluoballs into a stable form. When the energy level decreased, gluonic balls evaporated. Those balls formed cosmic vacuums. And then other particles fell into that microvacuum.

“Astronomers have discovered a “black hole star,” an extremely bright red spot in the early universe that appears to be a new type of astrophysical object. It resembles an enormous star. But its energy production is closer to what a black hole might generate. Credits: Image: Jose-Luis Olivares, MIT”. (MIT News, Astronomers discover a brand-new type of astrophysical object: A black hole star) 

This is impossible in the modern universe. But in the past. Those black hole stars could be quite common. But then the universe lost its density. Quasistars lost. There is suspicion that Spica or Stephenson 2-18 could be black hole stars. 

Maybe. Quasistars could form in the modern universe. This requires that the black hole form in the center of the interstellar nebula. And that can bring a new interesting idea about those little red dots. Could those very interesting objects in the dawn of time form

In the extreme heat plasma just after the Big Bang? This means those little red dots are the glowing embers. From. The Big Bang. Maybe the first objects that transformed hydrogen into heavier elements were those quasistars. The fusion reaction in material vortices in the quasistars formed heat and pressure that enabled fusion between impacting hydrogen atoms. Maybe. Those little red dots formed heavier elements that made our universe possible.  Quasistars or black hole stars could explain how protons and electrons formed matter. Turn into heavier elements than hydrogen. 

https://news.mit.edu/2026/astronomers-discover-brand-new-type-astrophysical-object-black-hole-star-0812

https://www.science.org/content/article/behold-glueball-strange-new-form-matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Red_Dots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-BH*-1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star