Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction.

 Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction. 

"Illustration of two novel theories exploring dark matter origins through a mirror world and early universe horizon." (Rude Baguette, “Dark Matter May Come From A Mirror World”: Bold Theories Suggest Hidden Twin Universe And Particle Factory At The Edge Of The Young Cosmos)

There is a possibility that some conditions in black holes are similar to those in a hypothetical anti-universe. That means black holes can be the source of dark matter. But if that is true. That model requires. There is a small anti-universe, or an anti-universe-like space, in every black hole. And if the only thing that differs between the anti-universe and our universe is the direction of time, that means there can be a small anti-universe in the black holes. Time travels in the opposite direction in black holes. So, maybe there are anti-universe-type conditions, and maybe. Some part of dark matter, or mysterious gravitational effects, forms in black holes. 

The new interesting theory about the origin of dark matter in the anti-universe requires more thinking. The thing is that the dark matter formed in the anti-universe is somehow utopian. However, theoretically, there could be anti-universes or structures that behave like an anti-universe within our universe. Those places are black holes. Behind the event horizon, time should move backward. And that thing can form a small-sized mini-universe in the black hole. 

The problem is how those weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, hypothetical dark matter particles, can escape from the black holes? The black hole vaporization can cause those particles to escape from the black hole. All black holes are losing mass. During that thing, the black hole sends gravitational waves. So, there is a possibility. The gravitational waves form when hypothetical gravitons are left outside the event horizon. When a black hole loses its mass. The event horizon withdraws, and that causes particles like gravitons to be left outside it. 

Another way to think about the black hole vaporization is to think of the black hole as a whirl. That while it always interacts with its environment, as all other whirls do. That whirl causes friction in the medium between the whirl's internal and outside structure. That means the contact between those whirls and the outside environment causes small whirls that steal energy from the higher energy space or field. 

Above: A Fractal can introduce a model of how a black hole, or the whirl in the Gravity, or G-field, creates other whirls around it. When it interacts with the outside G-field. 

The idea is that. The G-field makes a whirl when it impacts with another G-field that moves in another direction. In the same way, water forms whirls into the points where water flows in opposite directions. 

So, if we think that time is also like wave movement, the time that moves backward behind the event horizon can form a whirl in time or 4th. Dimension in the point where time moves forward and backward. And that point is the black hole event horizon. 

When escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. That means time turns to travel backwards. 

At the point where escape velocity reaches the speed of light, time stops. And then the time starts to travel in the opposite direction when escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. So, there should be some kind of whirl in time. 

And if we think that a black hole is like a time arrow that moves back in time, that means it should push particles around it forward in time faster than otherwise. That means if we use the time arrow model for that case, the particle near the black hole's event horizon should turn "very light" so that it can fall to the future. That means the time arrow, or the arrow of time, should push particles in the opposite direction when it travels through the spacetime. But that is only a philosophical expansion of that model. 

In the black hole case, the whirl is like in a G-field. That whirl interacts with the G-field that is outside that black hole or dense gravity, or the G-field whirl. When those environments touch each other, that forms a whirl. And that means the event horizon is full of whirls that are lying. The whirl's center is horizontal to the event horizon. And they can drive energy out from a black hole.

In some other models, the event horizon is a layer that seems to be full of photons. Those photons might make it seem like a ball, made of car tyres. That means the gravitons can escape from the middle of those photons. Or they can send gravitational waves to gravitons outside the event horizon. The event horizon can also send whirls inside the event horizon, and that forms entropy in the black hole. 

The idea is that the G-field is an independent energy field. That G-field forms from gravity waves. In black holes, the G-field has a higher energy level than the G-field outside the black hole. That means the G-field travels outside the black hole. The G-field is one of the fields of four fundamental forces. Those forces are gravity, weak, and strong nuclear interactions. And electromagnetism. 

Those fields are independently interacting substances. And that means G-field can rise to a very high energy level, and that doesn't mean that other fields must rise their energy level. But if the G-field is at a very high energy level. Or its density is so high that it can push other fields from around it. In the same way, if the G-field spins fast enough, that thing doesn't let other fields in it. 

The whirl interacts like a wheel that lets material and wave movement travel through the black hole. There could be a superstring or energy string that travels through the center of the whirl. But then. Those whirls are pumping energy out from the black hole. The black hole can also form whirls that can separate from the event horizon. Those whirls are like small kugelblitz-black holes. There is a possibility. Those whirls just explode immediately after they separate from the event horizon. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/dark-matter-may-come-from-a-mirror-world-bold-theories-suggest-hidden-twin-universe-and-particle-factory-at-the-edge-of-the-young-cosmos/

https://scitechdaily.com/two-wild-new-theories-could-finally-explain-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Multiverse theory, reality, or simply an idea?

 Multiverse theory, reality, or simply an idea? 

Are parallel multiverses real or not? The answer is that we don't know. We have no observations about those things. And that means they are non-proven models or theories. Or, maybe we should call the multiverse: "logical continuum of the universe structures, or models". 

So, it's rather philosophy than a scientific theory. That model explains dark energy, dark matter, and other unknown things as the energy and particles that come from another universe. There are instances where the universe in which we live will fall back to a single point. And then form again. That model is called "phoenix universe". Or in some models, another universe exists in the fourth or higher dimensions. But those models are unproven.. And maybe they will be unproven forever. In some models, things like virtual reality are also part of the multiverse or parallel universe theories. 

Multiverse is the theoretical framework where the universe is introduced as one of many universes. Or is it even a theoretical framework? The fact is that there is no single evidence of that thing. So, the multiverse theory is rather a philosophical conjecture or, so-called, logical expansion of the observations that researchers made of the universe. That means that if we believe the universe is composed of galactic superclusters, other universes would be universe-scale superclusters or hyperclusters. 

The other universe would be so dim that we cannot see it. In that type of observation, stars and other structures in our universe deny that sensors can detect radiation that comes from other universes. If they even exist. And who cares if those other universes exist? The multiverse is one of the models that tries to explain where matter came to our universe. That model could explain where matter came to our universe. But it would not explain where material in other universes came from? 

But there is one very interesting model of the multiverse. That model tells us that maybe we live in a black hole. Those hypothetical models explain why we cannot see things outside the universe that the black hole's material disk and halo press all waves that come from outside into a straight form. That means that we cannot see information in that wave movement. That model means that there can be other universes in the black holes. 

Those things are the fourth dimension. So there is a theoretical model. The black holes involve structures that are like our universe. So, that is one of the models that are made to explain why the universe exists. And the universe is part of the system of internal black holes. That is one of the models of the multiverse theory. 

But does the time reverse destroy that model? If we think of internal black holes, there is a possibility that when information comes to the edge of the next black hole or black hole's event horizon, time starts to move oppositely. So that means every black hole causes time reversal. But does that thing cause retrocausality? The retrocausality means that reaction comes before action. 

Even if those particles turn younger. Don't mean that things start to happen backward. 

Retrocausality seems like somebody looks at the film backwards. Or, that's how we represent that thing. But the fact is that retrocausality is not seen in large-scale structures. That thing is seen only in the smallest subatomic particles and their superposition tests. 

But then we can imagine one of the most interesting things in the multiverse philosophy, or the multiverse hypothesis. That thing is the anti-universe. Time moves backward because the anti-universe is in the middle of the big crunch.  Because particles and quantum fields turn closer and fields turn denser, that means time moves backward in that hypothetical space. But that doesn't necessarily mean that there is retrocausality in that universe. Maybe all things happen the same way as on Earth. But particles turn younger. 

A hypothetical black hole in that hypothetical universe will be an interesting thing. The idea is that time turns to travel backward in the point of the event horizon. So, that means that if the black hole is in an anti-universe, time travels oppositely in that black hole. So if time travels backward in the space behind the event horizon. That means time travels like it does in our universe if time travels backward around the black hole. 

The anti-universe means the universe that falls to the Big Crunch. Because all fields turn denser and stronger, the black hole will expand all the time. That means there is a possibility that this theoretical black hole in the theoretical anti-universe will not send gravity waves, because an expanding event horizon will close gravity waves inside it. The anti-universe doesn't necessarily mean a universe that forms from antimatter. Antimatter is like regular matter otherwise. 

But antimatter electrons have positive and antimatter protons have negative electric polarity. The anti-neutron spin is opposite to that of the neutron.  When an antimatter particle touches its mirror particle, both of those particles turn into radiation in the violent reaction called annihilation. That is the most powerful reaction in the known universe. But otherwise, antimatter reacts the same way to gravity and other fields. Antimatter is planned to be used in spacecraft. Because. It gives a very strong energy load. But that's the own story. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/parallel-universes-multiverse-real/

https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html

https://www.space.com/space-exploration/james-webb-space-telescope/is-our-universe-trapped-inside-a-black-hole-this-james-webb-space-telescope-discovery-might-blow-your-mind

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/the-multiverse-are-we-living-in-one-of-many

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality